DMV Closures in Alabama
Alabama
again made national news this past month and again not for something to be
proud of – the closure of 31
DMV offices around the state. Why did
they do this? Because the state was unable to pass a balanced budget and
instead of raising taxes or adjusting the tax code, further cuts were made to
an already anemic budget.
Of the DMV
offices that closed, most were in rural areas; this disproportionately affects
people the poor, elderly and persons of color.
It is estimated that some would now have to drive
over one hundred miles to be able to go to an office.
Many people
have tied the closing of the DMV offices to the loss of effectiveness of the 1965
Voting Rights Act; a key part which was struck down in the 2011 lawsuit brought
forth by Shelby County. The section
specifically required that any attempt by the state to alter its status quo
which could affect voting in Alabama must have pre-clearance by the Justice
Department. While anyone can still
register to vote and obtain a voter ID at their local Board of Registrar’s
Office for free, the state has simply made it harder to function and to live.
Many people
think of a photo ID law as a drivers’ license and fail to connect that they
need only go to the Board of Registrar.
While the state assures us that we can renew our licenses online now,
this still means that an estimated 40,000
people a year will need to go to only four offices in the entire state to receive
new drivers licenses and examinations.
This applies to new residents, license renewals following suspensions
and individuals needing to receive a license for the first time. For other individuals it is possible to renew
online or create digital licenses on your cell phone.
While it is
true, these are improvements (the ability to renew online); it implies access
to broadband internet, money for a smart phone and an ability to pay for
it. Yet there is extreme poverty in much
of the state, for instance Lowndes
County has a poverty rate of 37%. Furthermore race ties directly with the
poverty rate: “Broken down by race, 30.6 percent of blacks are in
poverty, 31.2 percent of Hispanics and 12.4 percent of whites” according
to al.com There is also a link to education - the less education a person has,
the more likely they are living in a cycle of poverty.
While governor
Bently denies that this decision to close the DMV was racially motivated,
the result is still the same – people who are poor, persons of color, the
disabled and the elderly are more directly impacted by this decision. These are the people who need more services
and who, as a result of the systemic structure of the state live in areas with fewer
well-constructed roads, safe bridges, access to broadband internet and an ability
to speak and have a voice in the election process. The state must ensure the safety, well-being
and education of its citizens, something I believe Alabama is failing at. How
could Alabama improve?
1. Deal with an unfair tax system which:
“The
lowest-paid fifth of Alabamians pay 10 percent of their incomes in state and
local taxes, while the top 1 percent pay just 3.8 percent.” Stop taxing groceries and examine why 1963
was the last time the state dealt with the sales tax in a meaningful way.
2. Stop earmarks in the Alabama state
budget to allow legislators more flexibility in how money is spent.
3. Create a new constitution for the
state of Alabama that is more favorable to the needs of the citizens of the
state instead of one written in 1901 in an era of white supremacy.
4. Stop talking about same-sex marriage
and abortion and focus on what matter most to the citizens of the state – state
sponsored services including expansion of Medicaid
so that 139,000 uninsured people have access to healthcare under the Affordable
Care Act and better infrastructure like safe
bridges and roads
and supply public
transportation so people can go to jobs and medical appointments. Improve
schools and educational resources!
If we work together we can build a better future for the
entire state. The closure of the DMV
offices are simply another in a long chain of limiting services to those who
need it most. The Bible teaches us that “…no inheritance of the children of Israel shall remove from
tribe to tribe; for the children of Israel shall cleave everyone to the
inheritance of the tribe of his fathers.” (Numbers 36:7) We are not
supposed to have resources pooled so that one tribe has all of the land,
instead everyone is supposed to benefit economically. Furthermore, we are taught to take a census
at the beginning of the book of Numbers to emphasize that everyone counts. We have forgotten that in this state, the buckle
of the Bible Belt. Our legislators are
focused on themselves and not leading the state for the betterment of its citizens
specifically the poor. The Bible teaches
us not to neglect the poor, the widowed or the orphan, which is a euphemism for
the people who fall in the margins. We
are only as strong as those who are in the margins, I pray that we are able to
see them and find a solution to solve this human made problem of leaving them
in the dust.
The use of the text from Numbers is particularly effective. Thank you for this level - eyed analysis of the systematic ways that state laws add to the burdens of the poor.
ReplyDeleteI don't understand. The verse seems to say that a tribe which, through luck or skill, becomes rich should NOT share with a tribe which through misfortune has become poor. Another translation, with context:
ReplyDelete"and so the Lord says that the daughters of Zelophehad are free to marry anyone they wish but only within their own tribe. The property of every Israelite will remain attached to his tribe. Every woman who inherits property in an Israelite tribe must marry a man belonging to that tribe. In this way all Israelites will inherit the property of their ancestors, and the property will not pass from one tribe to another. Each tribe will continue to possess its own property.”
Numbers 36:6-9 GNB (I know, a Christian translation, but consistent with the verse cited)
I suppose it depends on how you define "tribe", but I think the argument would be stronger without the verse.
Billon,
ReplyDeleteI understood that to mean that no one tribe would acquire wealth and not share it. That every tribe will retain what was given to them so that there is more equity. The daughters of Zelophehad were going to loose their property rights, Moses restored their rights, ensuring that everyone in the community had access to wealth.